Googles Secret Guidelines On Thin Affiliates


Journalist Henk van Ess has caused a flurry of excitement on blogs and forums. In his blog he revealed that Google uses teams of humans all over the world to evaluate the accuracy of Google's search results.

These "international agents", who are paid $10 to $20 an hour, were recruited mainly through universities. They're paid to check search results at Google every day.

Don't be distracted by the debate over whether Google should be doing this.

Of course it should. It's just a form of quality control.

Google can use the evaluators' findings to tweak its algorithms and reduce search engine spam.

Spam Recognition Guide

What affiliates need to pay careful attention to is Google's "Spam Recognition Guide for Raters", which Henk revealed.

If you're a "thin affiliate," beware.

Although the report is a year old, about 80% of its contents are still being used by Google's evaluators, Henk says.

The confidential document gives us an unvarnished look at Google's attitude to affiliates.

If you're using any of the "manipulative techniques" Google describes, this report will probably encourage you to take a hard look at your website.

I hope you're not silly enough to be using hidden links or hidden text. Not surprisingly, Google teaches its "raters" how to detect them.

PPC revenue earners under fire

Are you creating pages without much content with the aim of collecting pay-per-click (PPC) revenue? Google's raters are taught to mark such pages as "Offensive", and gives examples.

Google secret guidelines spend some time discussing different ways in which some affiliates display results from pay-per-click search engines, so if you're doing that, you'll definitely want to study this report carefully.

Are you displaying ads disguised as search engine results? Google finds them offensive.

Are you adding a dmoz.org feed to your site with the aim of earning PPC revenue? That's "offensive", too.

Google says:

"We differentiate between affiliates that produce extra service, value, or content, and those that simply are duplicates of other sites, set up to boost traffic to other sites and earn a commission for it. The former ones are not Offensive and should be rated on the merits to the query. The latter ones are Offensive...

"Thin affiliate doorways are sites that usher people to a number of Affiliate programs, earning a commission for doing so, while providing little or no value-added content or service to the user. A site certainly has the right to try to earn income;

we're attempting to identify sites that do nothing but act as a commission-earning middleman."

Affiliate networks seen as warning signs

To Google, affiliate links such as qksrv.net, bfast.com and myaffiliateprogram.com - on the page or in redirects - "strongly suggest" that the site is a thin affiliate.

Are you using an affiliate datafeed? To Google, that's another warning sign.

However, if you offer a comparison of prices between different online merchants, you're OK, you're not a thin affiliate.

Google provides an incredibly tough guideline, which hundreds of thousands of affiliate sites fail to meet.

Google says:

"Do not call a page affiliate spam when an affiliation is only incidental to the message and purpose of a website. To determine whether participation in affiliate programs is central or incidental to the site's existence, ask yourself this question: Would this site remain a coherent whole if the pages leading to the affiliate (merchant) were taken away?"

That probably counts out most affiliate sites.

In summary, if you want to be friends with Google, make sure you provide extra value or content.

I've quoted only parts of the report. Any serious affiliate will want to study the whole thing carefully.

You can read the full report on Henk's blog here...

www.searchbistro.com/spamguide.doc">http://www.searchbistro.com/spamguide.doc

Note: A Google employee broke a non-disclosure agreement by revealing this report. I don't know how long it will stay online. You may want to do what I did - save a copy of it on your hard drive.

Now we know what Google really thinks of affiliates. You've been warned.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Allan Gardyne has been earning a very good living from affiliate programs since 1998. Learn from an affiliate veteran. Get his FREE newsletter... www.AssociatePrograms.com/">http://www.AssociatePrograms.com


MORE RESOURCES:
For the last several months, the authors of the Cass Freight Index have  voiced economic concerns : While we are still not ready to turn completely negative in our outlook, we do think it is prudent to become more alert to each additional incoming data point on freight flow volume, and are more cautious today than

This week has been a worrying one for investors. Futures are indicating a bit of a bounce back early this morning and if that holds, the net effect of the last five days’ trading will not be that bad, with the S&P 500 losing only around one percent on the week. What is concerning is in part the way that has

We wake up this morning to a Friday pre market seemingly taking a breather from its negative sentiment most of this trading week and last with a little bit of everything to feed the kitty a softened tone on U S China trade tensions new Durable Goods orders and news from the U K that

Pre market futures are once again in the red this morning following Asian markets tumbling overnight The trade issue on either side of the Pacific Ocean especially with regard to the tech sector continues to wallow in something close to turmoil at this hour as the trade war between the U

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act gave big business a permanent tax cut and some, but not all, small businesses a temporary tax reduction. What's wrong with that

More retailers are reporting quarterly earnings results as calendar Q1 earnings season finally puts itself in the books Plus we look forward to parsing through the released minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee FOMC which had decided not to raise or lower interest rates at

Yesterday, the White House announced a complete embargo on the Chinese tech company Huawei. There have long been suspicions in the U.S. that Huawei are using their U.S. tech sales to in some way benefit the Chinese government, and the tensions that produced finally came to a head yesterday with the ban. That ban

It s a slow day for new economic data this morning and we ve yet to hear anything newly definitive regarding the U S China trade war at this point today but there are plenty of new quarterly earnings results from a number of retailers Interestingly the following stocks all currently

Overview:   Equities are paring some of their recent losses.  The MSCI Asia Pacific Index is posting its first back-to-back gain in a month, led by a more than 1% rally in China.  Heightened prospects for an Australian rate cut in a few weeks helped extend the run in the local equity market to a new record high. 

Major U S tech companies are taking the next step in the U S China trade war refusing to supply parts and technology to Chinese telecom giant Huawei 160 Intel 160 INTC 160 Qualcomm 160 QCOM and 160 Alphabet 160 GOOGL 160 are declining shipments of computer chips

After a three-session rally from Tuesday through Thursday that almost erased the 700+ point decline suffered on Monday, U.S. stocks ended Friday’s session on a downbeat note as reports emerged that trade negotiations between the U.S. and China had reached a stalemate. “Scheduling for the next round of negotiations

Sea container imports continue to indicate a weak (but possibly improving) U.S. economy. On the other hand, the rate of growth for export containers improved this month - with year-over-year growth (comparing April 2018 to April 2019) deep in expansion. Export growth generally correlates with the global economy.

“Headline risk” is a well-known phenomenon in trading and investing. Investopedia defines it as “the possibility that a news story will adversely affect a stock's price” or, as they point out, the stock market as a whole. I would add another danger: That headlines can prompt people into making trades that make

Following a Thursday trading session where all systems were go strong economic data better than expected earnings results from 160 Walmart 160 WMT 160 and elsewhere and a perceived cooling of tensions in the U S China trade war Friday s pre market paints a different

More economic data this morning brings more grist for the mill in the markets plus we see Q1 earnings results from big box retail giant 160 Walmart 160 WMT And for the first time in a while everything seems to be coming up roses Initial Jobless Claims 160 fell by 16 000 to 212K

Alopa.com ©